Random Ramblings

Murder City vs Convicts bout review.

March 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM | categories: skating, opinion, related groups, volunteering

A couple of thoughts on last nights bout. This won't be all that detailed I'm afraid, as I was focusing on keeping the score.

Background

Murder city roller girls came down to Hobart for their first ever inter league bout to play our local Convict City Rollers. Although its their first bout as a team they have been playing with Adelaide roller derby in training which should be helping them along.

About the bout

I think the convicts got off a bit lightly in their season opener (this game), coming up against a team that was really quite disorganised on the track.

The Homicidolls had a couple of stand out players, but by and large they didn't really work as a team. To compound that, they didn't hid hard, they struggled to hold back the Convicts jammers (most of the time) and they didn't control the pack.

Unfortunately for the Homicidolls, they suffered the same problem as any other away team: You can't be sure your best skaters go. Its a fact of life that with these leagues being amateur only (and in MCRGs case still starting out) there isn't a lot of money to go into things like travel.

Scores

Half time

Homicidolls: 54 Convicts: 78

Full time

Homicidolls: 98 Convicts: 201

This is keeping with the Convicts usual pattern of getting better as the bout progresses, but its interesting to see how much larger the first and second halves are. It should be noted the Convicts ended on a 20 point power jam, so without the last jam of the game it would have been 98 - 181. IMO that looks quite respectable for the Homicidolls first outing!

Photos

If you want to have a look at some pictures have a look at these by Chris Neugebauer.


Why I think everyone should referee

February 19, 2012 at 07:12 PM | categories: skating, opinion

One of the problems with the referee vs player separation (Which I feel is partially a result of the local ref group zebras without borders) was reinforced to me on Sunday when we wound up with one referee. One solitary ref. A full team of refs for roller derby is 7 strong, so you can see why this isn't quite right.

Now here is the thing: I don't think that was the logical way for things to end up.

The problem

In our current set up (and this may be a problem generic to derby leagues everywhere) there is a clear distinction between those who play and those who referee. While the referees can train with the skaters on skills they are not allowed to be bouting or scrimmaging skaters. This seems unfair as willingness to referee shouldn't be a hindrance to someones ability to play.

My solution

I'm proposing that everyone who passes their fresh meat trains as a referee as well as their contact and footwork skills. Skaters should have to referee in all positions (over time), but could probably be moved between them as they gain experience and skills in refereeing.

Ideally, certain referee skills would have to be passed with every level of skating skills passed, so as people go up through the ranks they become better at refereeing as well.

I feel this would help the skaters develop a better appreciation for what the referees do, especially at the travel team level. (I'd go so far as to say you should be required to pass a certain set of refereeing skills to make the travel team, but I don't see myself getting support there).

Now, this might seem a bit unfair - after all, its not a skill they will use on the track - but I argue that it will encourage a better understanding of the game by all involved. You HAVE to know the rules if you are going to play and you SHOULD know the referee hand signals. If you know them as a player why not be able to apply them too? It has several benefits on the league as a whole too. The up and coming skaters are no longer there to just watch the most senior players - probably the travel team - as they scrimmage. They are there to help them along, and learn from what they do. Not only that, they are gaining skills which can help the league support itself and improve the skills of its officiating too.

Conclusion

If the leagues (Convict city rollers in my case) had a culture that -everyone- has to referee from time to time, and everyone was trained to referee, then a couple of the players could be helping out as officials instead of training on the track. This would still count as training and would count towards any attendance requirements the league puts down.


How I want a conference to be run

January 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM | categories: opinion

I've been thinking about 'ideal' ways of running an event like linux.conf.au (LCA) or a GNU hackers meetup (GHM). This post is about how I like my conferences, and how (if given a chance) I'd try to set things out.

Because I feel smaller events are more enjoyable, I'd try and cap a full blown conference (like LCA) at 450-500 people. For something thats meant to be focused on getting hacking done (a GHM for instance), I expect a cap of 50-100 would be more appropriate. (There are balances to be made for something targeting a hackfest, since having too many people just detracts from progress).

The layout

  • The entire event would be run as what LCA calls miniconfs - small sub conferences focusing on one project/technology/area
  • Talks would happen in the morning, with the afternoon being spent on hacking
  • Talks would be allowed multiple speakers (up to three). BUT! If there are multiple speakers, each must speak for at least 30% of the talk time allocated (This would probably only apply to sponsored speakers)
  • All material must be distributed under the Expat licence, or a copyleft licence approved by the conference of the presenters choice
  • All talks must be recordable by the event and presentable to the public - nothing secret/private, it would conflict with the licence requirements.
  • All slides should be made available to download with the talk information via the conference website (Ideally with video streams).
  • Everyone has equal treatment. There are no closed events organised where only some participants can attend. All organised events are open to all delegates
  • And a rather awesome suggestion I saw on the LCA2012 mail list was to hold a conference on a boat.

The Jasper Hotel

January 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM | categories: personal, opinion

Edit: This was written in the first 24 hours. While I remain less then impressed, its probably not as dire as my ranting implies.

We are in Melbourne for Drupal down under 2012, and the official hotel of the event is the Jasper hotel At the moment, all I can say is just stay away - a long way away. Its expensive, the service is poor, our room - on the 6th floor - is noisier then the lobby, and the staff are rude.

(As a side note one wall of the bathroom is made of folding blinds. Weird.) Took 30 min to get 4 groups checked in when we arrived at around 7pm last night. This morning at breakfast we felt we had to go and ask for our table to be cleared for some menus after people who arrived after us were attended to and shown to a table (We were waiting for over 15 min, we didn't walk in the door and have a tantrum). Thankfully it wasn't all bad - the breakfast (when it arrived) tasted quite nice.

Edit two: Day 2, and feeling much happier. The only real what the !? moment today was the staff being unwilling to put the keynote speaker up the breakfast food order queue after ignoring him as he waited for someone to take his order.


Thoughts on iiNet eating Internode

December 25, 2011 at 10:00 AM | categories: opinion

Well, the news just in seems to be that my ISP (Internode) is now no longer the largest privately held ISP in Australia (and 4th largest overall). From the end of February it will be part of the iiBorg, making it part of the 2nd largest ADSL conglomerate in Australia.

There has been a lot of doom and gloom from Whirlpool, but I don't think its going to be all bad.

  • Simon Hackett has talked about Internodes growth plateauing
  • Simon has also talked about the NBN being favourable to big players, (see for example his post on why multiple pois are bad)
  • Hackett and Malone are friends (As mentioned in this article by The Australian)
  • Both have been running ISPs for ~20 years, and known each other the whole time
  • Hackett is now an owner of around 7% of iiNet shares, so has some weight when it comes to decision making
  • Hackett having 7% of iiNet makes it harder for TPG to buy more of iinet
  • Finally, Hackett gets to have his cake and eat it

Next Page ยป